5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For instance, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID necessary) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained on the record to attach the petitioner with the commission with the alleged offence. Although punishment of check here your alleged offence does not slide within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nonetheless figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case with the petitioner falls within the exception where bail cannot be granted even within the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion from the same is hereby reproduced:
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
whether when granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the pair had two young children of their own at home, the social worker didn't notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had younger children.
Though a lot of websites offer free case legislation, not all are equally reliable. It’s very important To guage the credibility from the source before relying on the information.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load provided to any reported judgment may perhaps depend on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[seven]
In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Development Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution gives first jurisdiction into the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and recognized experts to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.